I’d prefer
positivity. I would. But, I can’t take blind positivity over sighted reality.
Walker Percy wrote about one of
William Faulkner’s characters in The
Sound and the Fury. Percy said:
“Naming death-in-life as Faulkner
did with his character Quentin is a thousand times more life-affirming than all
the life-affirming self-help books about me being okay and you being okay and
everybody being okay when in fact everybody is not okay, but more than likely
in deep trouble. Beware of people who think that everything is okay.”[1]
People today prefer to be affirmed
in their lives and lifestyle choices. So, I recognize that standing behind a
Bible and repeatedly pointing folks to where that Bible seems to contradict
their comfortable lives makes me a cultural contrarian. I don’t necessarily
enjoy that posture, but if a light above us illuminates how stained our lives
are with sin, isn’t it better to talk about that, rather than trying to paint
over the stains with bright colors that make us feel better, but don’t really clean
up anything?
Pointing out the “death-in-life”
doesn’t make you the most pleasant voice in the room, but it may just mean you
are the most sane and sensible one speaking. Speaking to what is wrong isn’t
always a pretty sound to hear, but if we can diagnose what is wrong – however
painful that process may be – then we can start talking about how to treat it.
Here is what I believe (and hope)
will happen. If most people simply continue to talk as if there’s nothing to be treated, eventually the stench of the
dying all around us will overwhelm all the potpourri preaching, and somebody
will say, “What’s that smell?” Maybe then the contrarian will become a welcome
clinician who not only points to the festering sores of society, but also says,
“There is a balm in Gilead to make the wounded whole.”
Where you preaching pastor? Are you still in Alabama?
ReplyDeleteWwangabulldogs@aol.com
ReplyDelete